Skip to main content
Rentals & Sales
Landlord Today10 August 2026

Tenant application fraud averages 41 cases per 1,000 references, with London’s high-rent lets most exposed

Goodlord says suspected tenancy application fraud ran at 41 cases per 1,000 references between July 2025 and June 2026, with fraud volumes about 40% higher in 2025 than 2024. It puts the average direct loss per fraudulent tenancy at £9,601 and flags London, the West Midlands and the North West as higher-risk regions, with the biggest exposure in lets above £10,000 pcm.

tenant fraudtenancy application fraudLondon landlordsreferencing checksRight to Rentfake ID
Share:
Tenant application fraud averages 41 cases per 1,000 references, with London’s high-rent lets most exposed

Goodlord’s latest analysis puts suspected tenancy application fraud at 41 cases per 1,000 references across July 2025 to June 2026, and says fraud volumes were around 40% higher in 2025 than in 2024. For London landlords, the key point is that fraud is no longer limited to forged payslips or a borrowed passport. It can involve fabricated identities, manipulated ID documents and invented employers or referees, meaning a basic referencing pass may not be enough on its own.

What the reported losses could look like in practice

Goodlord estimates the average direct loss per fraudulent tenancy at £9,601, with potential sector-wide exposure of £4.1 billion a year. As the source summary does not break down that £9,601 into arrears, legal costs, damage or void periods, it is best treated as an aggregate estimate rather than a standard claim value. Even so, on a London flat at £2,200 pcm, four months of unpaid rent would be £8,800 before legal fees, cleaning, repairs or remarketing costs.

Where the risk is highest

Goodlord identifies London, the West Midlands and the North West as fraud hotspots, and says the highest risk sits in properties renting for more than £10,000 pcm. That is particularly relevant in higher-value London markets, where fast-moving relocations and polished applicant paperwork can make fraudulent applications harder to spot.

For single-property landlords, one bad tenancy can wipe out annual profit. For portfolio landlords and letting businesses, the bigger issue is often a weak process repeated across multiple applications.

There is no new legal deadline, but processes need updating

The source does not point to any new statutory deadline or legal change. But if your current process relies mainly on emailed PDFs, a quick credit check and one employer reference accepted at face value, it may be too easy to defeat.

A stronger approach is a multi-layer verification process:

  • inspect original ID where appropriate
  • use a reputable electronic identity check
  • keep a time-stamped record of what was checked, when and by whom
  • ask your agent or referencing provider what fraud-detection tools are included

That evidence trail may matter later if there is an insurance claim, possession case or fraud report.

Verify employment and income through independent channels

Payslips alone are no longer enough for higher-risk applications. A safer process is to verify employment using contact details sourced independently, such as:

  • the employer’s official website
  • a published switchboard number
  • the relevant company entry at Companies House

Where available, landlords and agents can also ask for additional evidence such as bank statement review or other payroll corroboration, rather than relying only on emailed PDFs. If an applicant claims to work for a business with no obvious public footprint, that is not proof of fraud, but it is a sensible point for escalation.

Referee checks should be more than an email

A written reference from a free email address should not be treated as strong evidence on its own. A more robust process is to:

  • contact referees using independently sourced details
  • speak to them directly by phone
  • record the date, number called and outcome

Cross-checking whether the referee is genuinely linked to the employer or business named in the application can help expose invented contacts.

Right to Rent checks are separate and still mandatory

Right to Rent checks remain a separate legal requirement and must still be carried out in line with Home Office guidance. Depending on the applicant’s status, that may mean a manual check, an online Home Office check, or use of an authorised Identity Service Provider route where permitted.

A Right to Rent check is not a full anti-fraud system, but weak ID handling can create both fraud risk and immigration compliance risk. Landlords should also keep the required copies and records of the check.

Know the deposit cap before asking for more protection

The source suggests stronger protections such as guarantors, advance rent, insured rent guarantee products and enhanced credit checks. That can be sensible, but landlords must stay within the Tenant Fees Act 2019 rules on deposits.

The tenancy deposit cap is usually:

  • five weeks’ rent where annual rent is below £50,000
  • six weeks’ rent where annual rent is £50,000 or more

So on a property at £4,500 pcm, annual rent is £54,000, meaning the maximum tenancy deposit is six weeks’ rent. Taking more than that would risk breaching the Act. If extra protection is needed, a properly referenced guarantor or suitable insurance product may be more realistic than attempting to take an unlawful deposit.

What to do if you suspect fraud

If fraud is suspected, preserve evidence first. That may include:

  • application emails
  • submitted documents
  • viewing notes
  • call records
  • tenancy-signing records
  • platform logs held by your software provider, where available

The source attributes to the NRLA the recommendation to report suspected fraud to the police and Action Fraud. Landlords should also notify insurers promptly and check whether their policy actually covers fraud, rent arrears, malicious damage or legal expenses.

If personal data is involved, keep records secure and handle them in line with UK GDPR requirements.

Train staff to spot warning signs

For managing agents and self-managing landlords with staff, training matters as much as software. Teams should know the common warning signs, including:

  • inconsistencies in document formatting
  • unusual shadows or edits on ID images
  • recently created employer domains
  • references that avoid live contact
  • bank statements that do not align with stated income

A written checklist used on every application is usually more defensible than ad hoc judgement.

Three practical actions to take now

  1. Within 7 days, map your application process from enquiry to move-in and identify where documents are accepted without independent verification.
  2. Before the next tenancy offer, require stronger identity, employer and referee checks for every adult applicant.
  3. Within 30 days, review insurance terms, rent guarantee conditions and document retention so you can evidence your checks if a claim or report follows.

This article is general information, not legal advice.

This article is general information, not legal or financial advice. Rules can change and may apply differently to each property. Check the dated source and seek appropriate professional advice before acting.

Need help reviewing your property?

Arrange a conversation with our team about your property, tenancy and the local requirements that may apply.

Request a compliance conversation

Stay informed

Get compliance alerts delivered weekly

Receive selected landlord updates and links to source material.

More landlord news you might find useful

AI tenant fraud is exposing weak ID checks — three controls landlords and agents should add in the next 30 days
Landlord Today28 August 2026

AI tenant fraud is exposing weak ID checks — three controls landlords and agents should add in the next 30 days

AI-enabled tenant fraud is increasing the pressure on older verification processes. For London landlords and letting agents, the risk is not only rent loss but also failures in AML controls, Right to Rent checks, record-keeping and data protection. The most practical response is to strengthen applicant verification, escalate higher-risk cases and keep a clear audit trail of decisions.

tenant fraudAI fraudidentity verification
MIT Live 2026 in London on 13 October: a useful prompt to review tenant-screening, GDPR and supplier checks
Mortgage Strategy31 August 2026

MIT Live 2026 in London on 13 October: a useful prompt to review tenant-screening, GDPR and supplier checks

Mortgage Strategy’s MIT Live 2026 on 13 October at County Hall, London does not create new legal duties, but it is a sensible trigger for landlords and letting agents to review how they use tenant-screening tools, CRM automations, ID checks and outsourced proptech. The article keeps the legal position clear: existing obligations under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 already apply, and any AI or automated processing should be backed by proper documentation, oversight and supplier checks.

MIT Live 2026Mortgage StrategyLondon landlords
Boutique Buy-to-Let Brokers Can Save Complex Deals — but One Missing Control Can Derail Them
Mortgage Strategy29 August 2026

Boutique Buy-to-Let Brokers Can Save Complex Deals — but One Missing Control Can Derail Them

A profile of broker Ashley Bradshaw is not a rule-change story, but it does expose a real operational risk for landlords: boutique mortgage firms can handle complex buy-to-let cases well, yet delays and disputes follow when FCA status, data controls, backup contacts and offer deadlines are left to assumption. Before the next purchase or remortgage, verify authorisation, lock down document handling and put responsibility for every deadline in writing.

buy-to-let mortgage brokerFCA authorisationFinancial Services Register
Tenant application fraud averages 41 cases per 1,000 references, with London’s high-rent lets most exposed | Rentals & Sales